- ابراهیمی، شهرام، «پیشگیری از تکرار جرم از طریق هوش مصنوعی؛ مقتضیات و محدودیتها»، دوفصلنامه آموزههای حقوق کیفری، دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی، سال نوزدهم، شماره 23، بهار و تابستان 1401 ش.
- بابایی، محمدعلی، و علی افراسیابی، «حق برخورداری متهم از وکیل مدافع در مرحلۀ تحقیقات مقدماتی»، دوفصلنامه آموزههای حقوق کیفری، دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی، سال هفتم، شماره 13، بهار و تابستان 1389 ش.
- توسلی نائینی، منوچهر، قدرتاللّٰه خسروشاهی، و زهره نصراللهی، «اصل برابری سلاحها در مرحله تحقیقات مقدماتی در قانون آیین دادرسی کیفری 1392 و اسناد بینالمللی حقوق بشر»، مجله حقوقی دادگستری، سال هشتادم، شماره 94، تابستان 1395 ش.
- جعفرزاده درابی، صادق، «شاخصهای دادرسی عادلانه در رویه مراجع نظارتی حقوق بشر»، تهران، پژوهشکده حقوق عمومی و بینالملل پژوهشگاه قوه قضاییه، 1397 ش.
- سافرلینگ، کریستوف، آیین دادرسی کیفری بینالمللی، ترجمه قباد کاظمی، تهران، میزان، 1397 ش.
- شاهد، بهارک، و نسرین مهرا، «برخی از جلوههای بارز الگوی دادرسی منصفانه در قانون آیین دادرسی کیفری مصوب 1392»، دوفصلنامه پژوهشهای حقوق جزا و جرمشناسی، سال ششم، شماره 12، پاییز و زمستان 1397 ش.
- صابر، محمود، آیین دادرسی دیوان کیفری بینالمللی، تهران، دادگستر، 1401 ش.
- همو، «معیارها و تضمینهای دادرسی عادلانه در مرحله تحقیقات مقدماتی»، فصلنامه پژوهشهای حقوق تطبیقی، سال سیزدهم، شماره 4 (پیاپی 63)، 1388 ش.
- فتحی، محمدجواد، و دادیار هادی، «جایگاه دادستان در سیاست جنایی نوین و الزامات دادرسی عادلانه»، فصلنامه فقه و حقوق اسلامی، سال چهارم، شماره 7، پاییز و زمستان 1392 ش.
- فضائلی، مصطفی، دادرسی عادلانه: محاکمات کیفری بینالمللی، تهران، شهر دانش، 1392 ش.
- کرایر، رابرت، هاکان فریمن، داریل رابینسون، و الیزابت ویلمز هورست، درآمدی بر حقوق و آیین دادرسی بینالمللی کیفری، ترجمه حسین فخر و داود کوهی، تهران، مجد، 1393 ش.
- محمودی جانکی، فیروز، و علیاکبر جلیلپیران، «تفهیم اتهام در حقوق کیفری ایران و رویۀ دیوان اروپایی حقوق بشر»، دوفصلنامه مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی، سال دوازدهم، شماره 1، بهار و تابستان 1400 ش.
- Books:
- Alie, Joe A.D., A New History of Sierra Leone, Seatac, J & M Publishers, 1985.
- Clooney, Amal & Philippa Webb, The Right to a Fair Trial in International Law, Oxford University Press, 2021.
- Delmas-Marty, Mireille & John R. Spencer, European Criminal Procedures, Cambridge University Press, 2002.
- Edwards, Alicia B., The Practice of Court Interpreting, Amsterdam-Philadelphia, John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1995.
- John Henry, Dingfelder Stone, Court Interpreters and Fair Trials, Germany, Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.
- Maga, Timothy P., Judgement at Tokyo: The Japanese War Crimes Trials, Lexington Kentucky, University Press of Kentucky, 2001.
- Mole, Nuala & Catharina Harby, The right to a fair trial: A guide to the implementation of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, Council of Europe, 2006.
- Namakula, Catherine S., Language and the Right to Fair Hearing in International Criminal Trials, Switzerland, Springer, 2014.
- Nowak, Manfred, N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: CCPR Commentary, Kehl, Engel, 2005.
- Olsen, Frances & Alexander Lorz & Dieter Stein (Eds.), Translation Issues in Language and Law, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
- Swart, Mia, Judges and Lawmaking at the International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda, Johannesburg, Bakwena Printers, 2006.
- Trechsel, Stefan (With the assistance of Sarah J. Summers), Human Rights in Criminal Proceedings, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005.
- White, Boyd, Justice as Translation: An Essay in Cultural and Legal Criticism, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1990.
- Articles:
- Almqvist, Jessica, “The Impact of Cultural Diversity on International Criminal Proceedings,” Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 4(4), September 2006.
- Bacik, Ivana, “Breaking the Language Barrier: Access to Justice in the New Ireland,” Judicial Studies Institute Journal, Vol. 2, February 2007.
- Bîrzu, Bogdan, “The right to interpretation and translation within criminal proceedings in the European Union. Comparative examination. Critical opinions,” Juridical Tribune, Vol. 6(1), June 2016.
- Brown-Blake, Celia, “Fair Trial, Language and the Right to Interpretation,” International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, Vol. 13(4), 2006.
- Karton, Joshua, “Lost in Translation: International Criminal Tribunals and the Legal Implications of Interpreted Testimony,” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 41(1), January 2008.
- McEvoy, Gearóidín, “Language proficiency and the right to an interpreter when accessing a fair trial,” The International Journal for Translation & Interpreting Research, Vol. 15(2), 2023.
- Nartowska, Karolina, “The role of the court interpreter: a powerless or powerful participant in criminal proceedings?,” in: The Interpreters’ Newsletter, No. 20, Trieste, EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2016.
- O’Donnell, Guillermo, “The Quality of Democracy: Why the Rule of Law Matters,” Journal of Democracy, Vol.15(4), October 2004.
- Ogwezzy, Michael Chukwujindu, “Communication of an interpreter and fair trial under nigerian criminal justice system,” International Journal of Legal Discourse, Vol. 1(1), April 2016.
- Schmalz, Dana, “Beyond an Anxiety Logic: A Critical Examination of Language Rights Cases before the European Court of Human Rights,” Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 20(1), April 2020.
- Sharma, Kritika, “Translation of Judgments: International Criminal Court (ICC),” Max Planck Encyclopedias of International Procedural Law, June 2020.
- Sherman, Julia, “The Right to an Interpreter under Customary International Law,” Columbia Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 48(3), 2017.
- Swigart, Leigh, “Linguistic and Cultural Diversity in International Criminal Justice: Toward Bridging the Divide,” The University of the Pacific Law Review, Vol. 48(2),
- Tomić, Alexandra & Ana Beltrán Montoliu, “Translation at the International Criminal Court,” New Trends in Translation Studies, Vol. 1, 2013.
- Transatlantic Translations Group, “The Importance of Legal Translation, A Global Solution Bringing Translations to Life,” New York, May 2023.
- Vogiatzis, Nikos, “Interpreting the Right to Interpretation under Article 6(3)(e) ECHR: A Cautious Evolution in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights?,” Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 22(1), March 2022.
- Wald, Patricia M., “Running the Trial of the Century: The Nuremberg Legacy,” Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 27(4), February 2006.
- , “The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia Comes of Age: Some Observations on Day-To-Day Dilemmas of an International Court,” Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, Vol. 5, 2001.
- Waldron, Jeremy, “The Rule of Law and the Importance of Procedure,” New York University School of Law, Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series, Working Paper No. 10-73, October 2010.
- Wanhong, Zhang, “From Nuremberg to Tokyo: Some Reflections on the Tokyo Trial (On the Sixtieth Anniversary of the Nuremberg Trials),” Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 27(4), February 2006.
- Waterhouse, Kate, “Interpreting Criminal Justice: A Preliminary Look at Language, Law and Crime in Ireland,” Judicial Studies Institute Journal, Vol. 2, July 2009.
- Documents & Cases:
- African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Resolution on the Right to Recourse and Fair Trial, Eleventh Session, 2-9 March 1992.
- Charter of the International Military Tribunal (London Agreement), 1945.
- Charter of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, 1946.
- Cuscani v. UK, Application 32,771/96, 24 September 2002.
- ECtHR, Hacioglu v. Romania, App. No. 2573/03, Judgment of 11 January 2011.
- ECtHR, Luedicke, Belkacem & Koç v. Germany, Series A, 29, 28 November 1978.
- HRC, Harward v. Norway, Communication No. 451/1991, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/51/D/451/1991 (15 July 1994).
- Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 13 (Article 14), U.N. Doc. HRI/GEN/1/Rev.1., 1994.
- Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 32 (Article 14), U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/GC/32, 2007.
- ICTR, Akayesu Case Judgment (2 September 1998).
- ICTR, Prosecutor v. Bagilishema, Case No. ICTR 95-1A, Judgement, 3 July 2002.
- ICTR, Prosecutor v. Rutaganda, Case No. ICTR 96-3-A, Judgement, 26 May 2003.
- ICTY Translation and Interpretation, <https://www.icty.org/sid/165>.
- ICTY, Prosecutor v. Kunarac, Case No. IT-96-23 & 23/1, Judgement, 2002.
- ICTY, Prosecutor v. Kupreskid, Case No. IT-95-16-A, Appeals Judgement, 2001.
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966.
- Law on the Establishment of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, 2004.
- Lawyers Committee for Human Rights, What is a Fair Trial? A Basic Guide to Legal Standards and Practice, New York, 2000.
- Prosecutor v. Bemba Gombo, ICC, Case No. ICC-01/05-01/08-424, 15 June 2009.
- Prosecutor v. Katanga, ICC, Case No. 01/04-01/07(OA3), 27 May 2008.
- Prosecutor v. Katanga, ICC-01/04-01/07, 7 March 2014.
- Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, ICC, Pre-Trial Chamber I, Case No. ICC-01/04-01/06-268, 2006.
- Roadmap Practitioner Tools: Interpretation and Translation Directive, Co-funded by the Criminal Justice Programme of the European Commission, 2015.
- Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, 1994.
- Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, 1993.
- Statute of the Special Court for Sierra Leone, 2000.
- Statute of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon, 2007.
- Translation Theory and Practice’ Summer Institute of Linguistics, <http://www.sil.org/
translation/TrTheory.htm>.
- Zeynalov v. Estonia, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/115/D/2040/2011 (2015).
|
